Refresh Events

Refresh Events encourages collaborative partnerships, fosters education at all skill levels and creates networking opportunities within the Toronto interactive community.

Event Fatigue in Toronto

Thursday, July 30th, 2009 | By: Justin Kozuch

Yesterday afternoon, I had the pleasure of Saul Colt’s company over lunch, and we discussed various ways to monetize business and create a community around content. The conversation drifted towards the number of events that are being curated in the city of Toronto. I’d like to talk about how the conversation went and some thoughts that I have on this topic.

Before I go any further, I’d like to give credit to Saul Colt, as it was his insights that formulated the basis for this post.

The Situation in Toronto

A quick glance at the YouSayYeah Calendar for the month of July 2009, and you’ll immediately see what the event landscape in Toronto looks like:

YouSayYeah Calendar - July 2009 Screenshot of Events

It’s enough to make your eyes water. If you filter this list and remove events for movie/music/art/fashion/food lovers, you’re left with 39 events relevant to our industry, be it conferences like FutureRuby, informal social gatherings like TechKaraoke or regular monthly gatherings like Toronto Third Tuesday or Wired Wednesday.

Most of us work 9-5’s and at the end of the day, we’re tired and would like to go home and spend time with our loved ones or pass out on the couch. However, we feel this constant need to connect, share, learn, inspire (or be inspired) and interact. In a sense, we are fulfilling a Maslow-esque need by attending these events and interfacing with fellow industry folks.

But when is it too much? At what point do we say enough? Are we suffering from event fatigue in Toronto?

The problem

The problem lies within the sheer number of events that take place. It’s very difficult for me to attend all these events. Doing so would require commitments that I cannot make, mainly due to time constraints (I have to sleep sometime!) and because of the high financial costs involved (eating out/having a few drinks 5 days a week or more can be costly). I’m sure that there are many of you out there that are thinking along the same wavelength.

With these factors in mind, how does one choose the events that they would like to attend, and keep our significant others happy, stay healthy (lack of sleep can result in severe psychological damage, or worse) and keep money in the bank?

Pick me, pick me!

When it comes to deciding which events I’d like to attend, the first factor I take into consideration is the type of event it is. Is it a conference, a networking session, or are there guest speakers? I like to know what I’m committing to before I register. I wouldn’t want to part with my money (or my time, which is just as valuable as money) if I wasn’t interested in the nature of the event.

Next I look at who’s speaking. Have I seen this person speak before at another event? What are they speaking about? Obviously, I’m going to attend if the person is interesting and their talk is relevant to my function and my interests. I have been known to ignore the former in favor of the latter. One of the reasons why I attended FutureRuby was because of the amazing people that I knew I would get to meet. I am not nearly as well-versed with Ruby on Rails as some of the other attendees, but I did get to meet some fascinating people that weekend and had a great time at the evening events.

I also look at who’s attending. Are my friends going? Are there people going that I can talk to who share my interests? Have I seen them recently? Am I going for purely social reasons, like getting out of the house and interacting with society? Even if I know one person who is attending, I am more likely to attend an event.

Finally, I look at the cost. This is a sticky point, not just for me but for many people. When you pay to attend an event, there has to be a quantifying of the expense. What value are you going to get out of attending? Is it an engaging speaker, a fascinating topic or an audience of attendees that I would like to connect with? Where dollars and cents are involved, there needs to be a derived value that may involve some or all of the above factors. While Wired Wednesday (for example) doesn’t charge for their events, if there was a nominal fee (like $5 or $10) introduced in the future I would gladly pay it. I would do so because of the connections I’ve made while at their events. I’ve had the opportunity to meet some interesting people working at some very interesting startups, some of whom have spoken at previous events.

How do you choose which events you attend? What factors come in to play for you when deciding if you are going to pay to attend an event, or attend those same events in the future (paid or free)?

What keeps you coming back for more?

Possibly Related Posts:


If you enjoyed this post, please leave a comment or subscribe to our RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  • I've definitely been feeling some event fatigue over the last while. Maybe even a bit anxious as well about whether I'm missing great content/getting tickets before they sell out ( ex: me and democamp #fail) and overall prioritizing when there are many great events running on the same night. Things as you said aren't getting any easier, there are more and more events released by the week!

    For myself personally I try to prioritize events as much as possible as well as try to keep connected to those who go to these events so at least if I have to miss one I can can grab the key points from them as well as still feel connected.
  • There should never be "one event to rule them all". I love the diversity of events in Toronto. It makes it a great place to live and work. I love that I have to now think critically about which events I want to attend. Knowing that I have a constraint on my time, dollars and attention. Like Justin I'm trying to get better at understanding each event and why I might attend.

    The goal is not to attend every event. But to attend the events that are important and interesting to you.

    For example, I didn't go to FutureRuby, not because of ticket prices, not because of content, not because of the people. By all accounts it was reasonably priced, with the content and people that I know and would gladly pay to engage and interact with. It was not a fit with my current role, it was not a fit for timing.

    I host events like DemoCamp and StartupDrinks because I want to help highlight and connect with other entrepreneurs in Toronto and across Canada. I go to Mesh because of the content (actually I sponsor Mesh because of the content and community). I do the same with the events that I travel to (SxSW, Mix, PDC, others) the constraints are more explicity. Money, time, travel.

    Being connected != attending every event.
  • Like David, I am a fan of the diversity in events in Toronto - but only to the extent that they aren't stepping on one another's toes. I'm finding that, from a model and content perspective, more and more of these events are starting to collide.

    What that ends up doing is making everyone's events look stale, become standard, and lose value. As a result, I'm finding myself more interested nowadays in attending things that challenge the status quo here (even if it's doing things differently for the sake of doing things differently).

    The social aspects are a big plus, but I can create those opportunities ad-hoc using Twitter anytime I want (i.e. who wants lunch, grab drinks, meetup for coffee). I almost prefer events where there are only a handful of people I've met before, and many more that I can start to share with and learn from.

    One last comment re: paid versus free. When it's free, everyone grabs a ticket so as to put it into their 'consideration pool' to attend. Sure they haven't made a 100% commitment, but they have some intention to go. When it's paid, what ends up happening is that they have to make that 100% commitment from the start and it falls out of that 'consideration pool' right away.

    It's probably always better to have more people considering to attend, than to try and reduce the drop-off rates to 0%. It's not a numbers game, but let people make their decision when they can.
  • @Kevin: I'd be curious to find out how we can help you "stay connected" if you miss an event.

    @David: I'd be personally very wary of any event that touts themselves at the "one event to rule them all". The nice thing about Toronto is that each event targets a different sector of our industry, which makes it somewhat easy to see the difference between each event. The problem (as I see it) is that the event space in Toronto is becoming a Venn diagram, and the intersection is becoming bigger and bigger. This results in having 39 tech community related events each month.
  • An excellent and timely post, Justin. This has been on my mind a lot, not only because I share the same "time, attention, dollars" trade offs, but also because I have a family with 2 young children and it is simply unfair to be away most evenings of the week (my husband and I have our household operation down to military precision).

    I agree with David that this is what makes Toronto so very special. I even heard people from Austin and other US cities wishing they lived here.

    I have seen a few attempts to group events together. This may work on special occasions, but overall I prefer to see each "brand" develop independently.

    For the purpose of networking, I think vis-a-vis is key but that's only one part of the equation. There are so many ways to start, build and nurture relationships both online (I get to know some people very well via Twitter first) and offline (coffee chat, anyone?), it is important to remember that attending every single event does not mean you are the most connected person around; but not attending any event means you miss one of the best ways to connect with people who may make a difference in your life.

    As for content, there is a risk of providing only "hot topics" like social media. While it drives attendance, it makes many events seem, well, the same. What can I get from a specific event (content wise), I often ask, that I cannot get from,say, blogs? Differentiation is very important to support the diversity of happenings in Toronto.

    I think there is a need to develop new formats. So far we have keynote presenters, ignite speakers, speed geeking, democamp, startupnorth, etc..i can see additional formats that can REALLY get conversations going during AND after the events.
blog comments powered by Disqus